Files
Abstract
Relational framing theory (RFT; Dillard, Solomon, & Samp, 1996) is a staple of the interpersonal communication literature. The theory conceptualizes relational communication as a function of three dimensions: dominance, affiliation, and involvement. The framework has been criticized for issues surrounding unit of analysis, measurement, verisimilitude, and falsifiability. This thesis aims to address these criticisms, with particular focus on measurement. To date, communication research using RFT generally follows the operational norms set by Dillard et al. (1996) in conceptualizing dominance and affiliation as separate dimensions that correspond to separate bipolar constructs. This thesis adopts a dialectical process-oriented inquiry (DPOI) perspective to reoperationalize RFT, viewing dominance and affiliation as interdependent phenomena that correspond to a single bipolar construct called relational framing. Other important theoretical issues, including frame displacement and the role of involvement, are also clarified. Implications, limitations, and future directions are discussed.