There is much research on food deserts and food security; however, the correlation between them has not been fully explored. While there is general consensus that food insecurity is an obesity related issue, there is growing debate on whether food deserts actually exist. Traditionally, food deserts are defined based on the perception of a distance travelled, meaning they can be interpreted or defined various ways. This paper focuses on three main questions. First, determining if the perception of living in a food desert has an effect on being food insecure. Secondly, to compare the effects of living in a traditionally defined food desert to living in a broadened redefined food desert on food insecurity. Lastly, to determine if a broader food desert definition is a better measure. Findings from this study can help policymakers provide better understanding of those living in a food desert or dealing with food insecurity.