Files
Abstract
Unmanaged stormwater flows can threaten life, property, and the natural environment. Already damaging and deadly, flooding will only worsen as seas rise. Local governments are
critical players in the inter-governmental effort to manage flooding and sea level rise. To adapt,
local governments must invest in their infrastructure systems based on the complex risks and
uncertainties underlying both flooding and sea level rise. This dissertation studies local
governments’ budgetary decision-making at the macro and micro scales through three empirical
studies. The first study assesses local governments macro-budgeting decisions by modeling flood
control investment based on the demand of the median voter. The first study tests if local
governments invest in flood control infrastructure systems in response to either experienced
damages, new information on their flood risks, or if they fail to invest in response to their risk at
all. Results indicate that local governments decide to pursue flood control infrastructure in
response to damages which they develop in response to new scientific information. The second
study turns to the micro-level and investigates how local governments’ public works directors
would prioritize assets at risk of failure if seas were to rise through a decision-making
experiment. Applying cumulative prospect theory, the second study argued that public works
directors should be decreasingly sensitive to increases in assets’ criticality and to changes in
assets’ probability of failure as the probability of failure departs from impossibility or certainty.
However, the results show that works directors tended to exhibit risk aversion because they were
decreasingly sensitive to both increases in assets’ importance and probability of failure across the
full range of failure probabilities. Finally, turning back to the macro-level, the third study
developed cost-functions to test if systematic capital budgeting practices could improve local
governments’ cost-efficiency by improving the decisions surrounding stormwater investments.
However, the third study indicates that while environmental and scale factors drive costs, neither
master plans nor asset inventories improve cost-efficiency. Overall, investing in flood control,
stormwater management, and sea level rise resiliency can improve public safety and water
quality but requires the commitment of public and elected officials.