This thesis explores the field of Narrative Criticism and its application to Biblical Literature. It zeroes in on the application of this method as it is applied to The Gospel of Mark and the Gospel of John. This is be done by examing the field of narrative criticism outside of the Bible, and then focusing on the two pioneering works in this area, mainly Mark as Story by David M. Rhoads, and The Anatomy of the Fourth Gospel by R. Alan Culpepper. This thesis attempts to show how the results of this type of study do not contradict historical studies, and can in some case work to compliments other types of Biblical Criticism. This is done by examining the literary function of Joseph of Arimathea.